Pedagogy and Teaching
HUMAN-CENTERED AND TRAUMA-INFORMED
Never having considered myself an educator, I arrived to my doctoral program with the purpose and intention of researching sexual violence and intersectionality studies. Through my role as a body of labor for the institution and my fortune of being pedagogically mentored by critical Professors I respect, admire, and appreciate, I quickly fell in love with teaching. As a teaching assistant and eventual instructor of record, more and more I realized my years of prior experience planning and leading travel groups abroad had prepared me to thrive in the classroom setting. I am passionate about conceptualizing new courses and revamping existing courses, embracing both practices as opportunities to meet students and the progression of my own research where we are in timely and innovative ways.
Within and beyond the classroom, my teaching philosophy remains steadfast in making every effort to ensure my approaches to scholarly contributions, engagement with anti-violence organizations, and especially to educating students remain collaborative, human-centered, and trauma-informed. I excel in mentoring students who are passionate about a particular social issue(s), informed by their own lived experience in relation to it, and driven by a sincere interest in humanities-based approaches to creating social change. Interested in the meeting points between theory and practice, as societal events and lasting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to exacerbate the ongoing urgency of dismantling intersecting systems of oppression from every possible angle, I have learned students are very much in need of individualized and collective forms of attention that consider them entire, complex human beings. In addition to focusing on papers, projects, and course assignments, I attempt to help keep front and center the importance of personal wellbeing and access to university and community-based resources. Life challenges can motivate or demotivate us all depending on the day. I am intellectually, politically, and personally interested in meeting students where they are in their educational journey. I am committed to figuring out ways in which I might help students continue to accomplish their intellectual goals, no matter their discipline or industry, and often in spite of it all.
CURRENTLY.
VISITING INSTRUCTOR | FALL 2023
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE | CRITICAL THEORY & SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
CTSJ 120
POWER, POLITICS, & SOCIAL CHANGE
CTSJ 140
CRITICAL THEORIES OF GENDER AND SEXUALITY
TEACHING ASSISTANT | FALL 2023
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ANNENBERG SCHOOL FOR COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM
CMGT 540
USES OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
COMING UP.
VISITING INSTRUCTOR | SPRING 2024
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE | CRITICAL THEORY & SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
FYS 64
MEDIA, VIOLENCE, & TRANSFORMATIVE JUSTICE
CTSJ 220
INTERSECTIONALITY THEORY & COMMUNITY-BASED PRAXIS
PREVIOUSLY.
CTSJ 160: INTRODUCTION TO FEMINIST STUDIES
VISITING INSTRUCTOR | SPRING 2023
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 24
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Excited to join the Occidental community and teach a course within the Critical Theory and Social Justice department, Introduction to Feminist Studies was an introductory course designed to help students across disciplines apply a critical multidisciplinary intersectional lens to constructions of gender, sexuality, and feminism(s) at the interpersonal, public, and cultural levels of society. Together we centered cultural studies, indigenous studies, intersectionality studies, gender and sexuality studies, violence and trauma studies, transnational studies, and more to analyze the complexities of power dynamics informing historical and contemporary forms of feminist activism. We assessed and critically engaged gendered dominant cultural narratives and counter-narratives working to reinforce and/or resist binary conceptualizations of femininity and masculinity in society. Through abbreviated and participatory lectures, active discussion-based engagement, and student leadership opportunities, this course was conducted in the spirit of collaboration, with mutual learning in mind. The aim of this course was to tap into the critical feminist scholar activist within each student, prompting scholars to embrace the importance of feminist advocacy related to timely social issues that matter most to them. This course sought to equip students with a deeper theoretical and applied understanding of feminist studies informing how to exist in the world, how to communicate, how to push back, how to survive, and how to carry forward in ways that advance feminist thought.
SWMS 219: INTRODUCTION TO FEMINIST THEORY
TEACHING ASSISTANT | FALL 2022
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 150
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Fortunate to be selected and continue my appointment as a teaching assistant for the USC Dornsife Gender & Sexuality Studies Department at USC, this was my second time assisting Dr. Diana York Blaine in teaching this particular general education course. In leading two discussion sections once again, I felt even more at home with the GSS community and fortunate to delve even deeper into feminist theory alongside brilliant undergraduate students spanning disciplines, majors, and minors at USC. This inspiring experience further primed me to stand on my own two feet with confidence as an instructor of record for future feminist studies focused courses.
COMM 395: GENDER, MEDIA, AND COMMUNICATION
INSTRUCTOR OF RECORD | SUMMER 2022
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 13
COURSE NOTE: Topics covered in this course included theorizing gender and communication through media; intersectionality and the complexities of power; reproducing and mediating gender; the gendered state of violence; subjectivities and narratives of gender and sexuality; gender, media, and anti-violence advocacy; “loving from below”: gender, media, and communication as resistance; and coalitional feminism: building cultures of care.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Selected by the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism to co-instruct a summer course, COMM 395: Gender, Media and Communication is a longstanding upper-division theory course offered through the department, revised through an anti-violence scholar activist lens. The course was designed to help students apply a critical intersectional lens to constructions of gender, largely influenced and informed by media representations and communication practices at the interpersonal, public, societal, and cultural levels. Together in this course we examined images across platforms (e.g. film, news media, television, advertising, social media, archives, and more) to understand how media can shape our understanding of gender. As an interdisciplinary course we engaged cultural studies, critical media studies, violence and trauma studies, gender & sexuality studies, and transnational studies to examine the influence of media on communication and culture. We assessed and critically engaged dominant narratives and counter-narratives working to reinforce and/or subvert binary conceptualizations of femininity and masculinity in media. Through participatory lectures, student presentations, and discussion-based engagement, sometimes all in one day, this course was conducted in the spirit of collaboration, with mutual learning in mind. As critical scholars who research violence and trauma, maintaining any societal issue can be considered a feminist issue, alongside my co-instructor we aimed to tap into the scholar activist within each student, prompting them to embrace the importance of anti-violence advocacy related to timely social issues that matter most to them. We strived to equip students with a deeper understanding of the power dynamics influencing media narratives and teaching us how to be, how to communicate, how to push back, how to survive.
SWMS 212: INTRODUCTION TO GENDER & SEXUALITY: “AMERICAN” PERSPECTIVES
TEACHING ASSISTANT | SPRING 2022
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 150
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Selected for an annual appointment with the USC Dornsife Gender & Sexuality Studies Department, this longstanding general education course was created and taught by Dr. Diana York Blaine, who turned out to be an exceptional mentor open to collaboration. Within the two discussion sections led by me, together students reviewed and discussed main concepts from the lectures and readings. As each week of lecture addressed important, timely, and sensitive issues, my intent was for us to take each of these topics seriously through our shared (and often differing) critical engagement during discussions. I encouraged students to imagine the gender and sexuality studies theorists, whose work we were reading, in the room with us. Students examined how they might place themselves in conversation with the scholars they were engaging. Which forms of gratitude and/or critique might students have to offer? How might they suggest carrying forward these scholarly works, placed in conversation with their own understanding(s) of gender and sexuality? What might they contribute to the conversation through their own voice, informed by their own lived experience(s)?
SWMS 219: INTRODUCTION TO FEMINIST THEORY
TEACHING ASSISTANT | FALL 2021
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 150
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
As the first part of my annual appointment as a teaching assistant for the USC Dornsife Gender & Sexuality Studies Department at USC, this general education course was also created and taught by Dr. Diana York Blaine. Within the two discussion sections led by me, together students reviewed, discussed, tapped into, and skimmed the surface of the geneology of feminist theory. Taught at a time when USC was first returning to campus for in-person courses amid the ongoing global pandemic, I did my best to remain flexible with students who benefitted from more of a hybrid experience for a myriad of reasons. Students were active in honing their critical thinking skills, no matter their level of education in feminist theory. They were prepared and then primed to embrace the interdisciplinary value of feminist theory and gender & sexuality studies. They actively committed to learning from one other and respectfully helped one another grow as feminist scholars and human beings. They were encouraged to think about their own educational, activist, professional, and personal goals. Early in the course, students brainstormed social issues that were most important to them, challenged to approach each societal issue as ripe for critique through a feminist theoretical lens.
COMM 204: PUBLIC SPEAKING
INSTRUCTOR OF RECORD | SUMMER 2021
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 4
COURSE NOTE: The design of this critical course syllabus was inspired and largely informed by Dr. Sonja K. Foss’s article titled, Revisioning The Public Speaking Course (1992). It was also designed with gratitude to USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism educators, friends, and colleagues who have paved the way and taught COMM 204: Public Speaking before my time, especially Dr. Courtney Cox, Dr. Sarah Kessler, Dr. Sulafa Zidani, Dr. Lauren Sowa, and Dr. Rogelio Lopez.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Selected by the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism to teach a stand-alone course, this summer session was conducted virtually with a small group of 4 students at various stages of their academic journey. Public speaking permeates human life in a multitude of ways. The collective purpose and aim of this virtual course was to help students strengthen their public speaking proficiency through both a theory and practice-based curriculum. Presentational speaking and speaking-listening processes were practiced and assessed across multiple contexts. As a public speaking class, this was also a learning experience in finding, developing, and strengthening students’ own critical voice, in connection with relevant professional, intellectual, and personal areas of interest. By collaboratively cultivating a brave space and culture of respect, students benefitted from a space in which authentic peer feedback and group engagement will be embraced and celebrated. Through this course, students tapped into existing technologies and engaged new innovations, in order to grapple with the necessary experience of presenting in virtual spaces as together we continued navigating a global pandemic. After partaking in this course, students improved their speaking, listening, and critical thinking abilities in key areas including: cultivating abilities to research, critcally engage, and present important topics to a collective; give engaging, responsibly developed speeches, applicable to a variety of contexts; listen and share feedback with others’ speeches, in ways that simultaneously challenge and uplift one another; effectively use technology in (virtual) experiences with public speaking; tap into personal passions and purpose, but also with reflexivity, ethics, and empathy to inform more authentic approaches to public speaking; hone their own unique voice, using body language and voice effectively, remaining flexible, creative, and proactive in virtual vs. in-person settings; strengthen flexibility and resiliency in the face of challenges that often arise leading up to, during, and following experiences with public speaking.
COMM 360: LOS ANGELES COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE
GRADER | SPRING 2021
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 50
COURSE NOTE: While USC course evaluations did not appear to account for TA written feedback from students, and despite the course being conducted virtually as we continued navigating the global pandemic together, this semester resulted in an amazing experience interfacing with students as a grader in support of valued mentor Dr. Robeson Taj Frazier. Together with Taj and my co-TA Joshua, we created a virtual environment within which students were able to openly discuss lived experiences while remaining grounded in course content focused on the culture of Los Angeles.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Collaboratively created years prior by Dr. Robeson Taj Frazier and taught within the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, this course places a communication and cultural studies lens on the city of Los Angeles. Students were taught to treat Los Angeles as a case study for working to understand culture, politics, and society. According to the syllabus, this course explored representations of Los Angeles communicated in diverse media and diverse forms of popular culture. It considered the expressed, produced, and received, rhetoric of and about LA and its surrounding areas. History, media, and culture played a central role to analyses conducted in class. Weekly readings balanced general discussions of L.A. history, culture, art, media, and critique with a specific focus on themes including: “the development and struggles over the city; policies and practices related to housing, real estate, transportation, education, and arts/culture; different and ever-changing media and literary depictions and imaginaries of the city; as well as the various movements and moments of political and civil unrest. What’s key for this course is linking our developing engagement with the past with a critical focus and interrogation of both the present and what is at stake for the future.” As a grader for the course, I was steadfast in mentoring, offering detailed written feedback, and remaining accessible to student needs, helping to make sure course concepts landed and always in partnership with Joshua and Professor Frazier.
COMM 206: COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE
TEACHING ASSISTANT | FALL 2020
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 150
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A course best taught at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism to 100-150 students by and according to one of my personally most appreciated mentors Dr. Cristina Mejia Visperas, “This course was designed as an introduction to Cultural Studies, an interdisciplinary area of critical analysis, ideas, concepts, and research that is essential to the academic discipline of Communication. Communication(s) refers to the various practices and technologies we use to convey and share information and feelings, and to connect people, places, ideas, things and products. Culture, however, is a more complex and elastic concept, its definition more difficult to establish firmly. To some degree, it denotes both the history and legacies of such systems of communication, and even more systems of meaning making. But it also indicates how such systems of information, communication, and meaning are negotiated, articulated, constrained, and transformed within a society. Culture consequently describes the totality of all communication practices, terms, and systems of information and meaning. It signifies what people actually do, i.e. their agency, as well as the social context, i.e. the structure where these practices and processes are shaped and enacted.”
COMM 395: GENDER, MEDIA, AND COMMUNICATION
GRADER | FALL 2019
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 50
COURSE NOTE: In support of Dr. Sarah Kessler, a mentor who treated me like a colleage and collaborator before the course even commenced, I was a grader responsible for helping to teach 50 Communication students about the relationship between gender, media, and communication. Bearing witness to Professor Kessler’s critical and human-centered approach to pedagogy has been highly instrumental in my own development as a cultural studies educator.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
According to Professor Kessler’s syllabus, ”Together students interrogated and challenged dominant cultural notions of gender as a biologically fixed female/male binary. Together, we examined how normative ideas about femininity and masculinity influence how individuals behave and communicate, and, not least, how media both construct and reflect cultural understandings of what it means to be ‘male or female.’ This course was deeply interdisciplinary: we used theories from communication studies, cultural studies, film and media studies, gender studies, and queer studies to explore different processes and practices of gender, specifically in terms of media representations of femininity and masculinity. Rather than framing it as an isolated concept, we approached gender intersectionally, i.e. in relation to other defining aspects of identity such as race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, and nationality. By examining how ongoing debates on gender construction characterize depictions of gender in media, we considered gender’s crucial intersections with notions of power, identity, and voice; explored possibilities of challenging the conventional ways we imagine and perform gender; and envisioned the kinds of social and cultural shifts such transformations might bring.”
ASCJ 210: CONTOURS OF CHANGE IN MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION
TEACHING ASSISTANT | FALL 2018
COMMUNITY OF STUDENTS: 100
COURSE NOTE: With no prior experience in teaching, other than leading groups abroad, I arrived to the start of this semester with little understanding of what a discussion section was. I learned in that same moment I would be leading two. I am eternally grateful to my co-TA Dr. Tyler Hiebert for taking me under his wing and showing me the ropes of being a teaching assistant at USC Annenberg. I felt dropped in the deep end, quickly fell in love with teaching, and ultimately ended the semester having learned to swim by doing.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
In support of Dr. Robeson Taj Frazier, who by the end of the semester would become one of my most valued and highly influential doctoral program mentors, particularly when it comes to developing lectures intended to actively engage students, this course explored “‘Change’ as a central theme and topic discussed in many Annenberg classes. According to the course syllabus, ”Educators consistently challenge our students to consider: 1) the changing political, economic, technological and cultural and geopolitical context of media, communication technologies, and sociocultural practices of meaning making; and 2) how communication practices, industries, and fields of life have built on earlier histories of communication, media, and social life and changed over time. Students often respond to these ideas by asking themselves and Annenberg faculty/staff how they should approach the inevitability of change in the communication and media fields and best prepare – professionally, intellectually, and socially – for becoming and being responsive, innovative, and transformative agents and citizens amid such change. The course encouraged students to see and understand change through different lenses — institutional, social and cultural, as well as individual — thereby exposing them to structures, spectrums and actors precipitating change. Students also gained perspective on the impact and valuation of change, how it manifests in a legal, political, economic, and/or social contexts, and how changes are felt, read and understood by a broad public and citizenry. Each week, we worked to situate the discussed themes in various historical and contemporary events, struggles, and personalities. Thus, while the themes were presented to students theoretically, the themes also offered tangible and accessible dimensions via historical and current-day examples connected to the issues and concerns of our contemporary moment.”
A friendly note about syllabus plagiarism: I am a community-minded scholar who believes deeply in the importance of collaboration, coalition-building, and individual ego death. I also value mutual learning opportunities, respect for personal boundaries, and attributing the genealog(ies) of intellectual contributions with care. If you are arriving to this page and wish to make use of any of the syllabi (adapted or original) linked to this page, please ethically cite, reach out so we may chat together about critical pedagogy, and trust I will always embrace constructive feedback as an opportunity to evolve and grow as an educator.
STUDENT SENTIMENT
CTSJ 160 | SPRING 2023